On March 9, 2015 ▲Church appealed adverse determination by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis denying access to information pertaining to Pursuit Lead Cables. ▲Church appealed this decision to the Associate General Counsel of Homeland Security.
▲Church learned the Department of Homeland Security issued Pursuit Lead Cables while conducting its research for White Paper on Security. After telephoning the Department of Homeland Security, on August 11, 2014 ▲Church filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking documents on Pursuit Lead Cables. Seeking answers about the procedure, filing an FOIA request, and speculating constitutionality of the practice, ▲Church finally received a response from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis on January 13, 2015 claiming the documents were exempt in the interest of national intelligence.
With no information about Pursuit Lead Cables appearing anywhere else, ▲Church appealed the Office of Intelligence and Analysis’ final response. His first day in Office President Obama issued a memorandum stating Freedom of Information Act requests should be handled with a clear presumption in the face of doubt openness prevails. However I&A’s determination of 2014-IAFO-0246 was affirmed because these documents are classified.
Acting on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security General Counsel, as the result of a memorandum of agreement, the United States Coast Guard rendered a decision on FOIA Appeal 2015-HQAP-00091. The Office of the Administrative Law Judge decided documents including Pursuit Lead Cable were classified and therefore Homeland Security’s decision to withhold the records from requesters has been affirmed in a two-paged letter (link to page two).
Pursuant 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B) the only recourse is to file a complaint in U.S. District Court for relief from Homeland Security requesting it release agency records.